DOJ-OGR-00000999.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
Casest:20-cr/00BRG@AUNnt BON rt L20FilesoGRISI2P ahage 26261019
than any other inmate at the MDC, and thus she cannot claim any greater need for bail than the
many inmates awaiting trial there.’
The virus, of course, presents new and complex challenges for protecting inmates’ health,
but the BOP generally, and the MDC specifically, are prepared to handle the risks presented by
COVID-19 and other health issues. The MDC’s response to the pandemic was the subject of
extensive evidentiary hearings in the context ofa civil lawsuit in the Eastern District of New York.
See Chunn v. Edge, No. 20 Cr. 1590, 2020 WL 3055669 (E.D.N.Y. June 9, 2020). In Chunn, the
District Court conducted extensive fact gathering about the conditions at the MDC before
concluding that “MDC officials have recognized COVID-19 as a serious threat and responded
aggressively.” Jd. at *1; see also id. at 25 (“The MDC’s response to COVID-19 has been
aggressive and has included, among other steps, massively restricting movement within the
facility, enhancing sanitation protocols, and creating quarantine and isolation units. And the data—
though limited—suggests that these measures have been quite effective in containing COVID-19
thus far.”).
Numerous judges in this District have rejected applications for release based on assertions
about the hypothetical risks of COVID-19, including multiple cases involving defendants who,
unlike this defendant, suffer from underlying health conditions. See, e.g., United States v. Hanes-
Calugaru, No. 19 Cr. 651, ECF No. 257 (S.D.N.Y. May 4, 2020) (Swain, J.) (denying pre-trial
bail application by defendant who was on MDC’s initial high-risk list but subsequently removed
following new CDC guidance (see ECF Nos. 239, 242, 257)); United States v. Curry, 19 Cr. 742,
ECF No. 37 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2020) (Hellerstein, J.) (denying pre-trial bail application by
3 The defendant also argues that the circumstances of the pandemic would pose a “significant
hurdle” to the defendant’s ability to flee. Opposition Memorandum at 16. The Government
submits that the defendant has the means and resources to find her way out of the country, and a
short quarantine period abroad would be a small price to pay to avoid years in prison.
14
DOJ-OGR-00000999
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00000999.jpg |
| File Size | 549.2 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 94.3% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,273 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 16:07:50.369541 |