DOJ-OGR-00010000.jpg

Caébas PARQ OAS URS PAN 1 BemorrantiGieZ 0 IRS DAP ab dtp ® L30F dfS080 asno b&w Ne NNN MN NE EPR Pe ee eee UWFWNMrFOW OAR OBWNEeE Oo A-5717 260 C2GFDAU1 Brune — direct from voir dire all the way through the verdict, right? A. Yes. Q. Now, Ms. Brune, you are an officer of this court, correct? As foam Q. And as an officer of the court you have ethical obligations, correct? A. I do indeed. QO. And you have an obligation to be truthful to the Court? Ay Xess Q. And you have an obligation to promptly disclose to the court any information that you might have suggesting juror misconduct, correct? A. I don't agree with your characterization. I had an ethical obligation to bring whatever material that I thought was accurate to the Court and that's what I tried to do throughout the trial. Q. On May 12, 2011, you received information, significant information that related potentially to Juror No. 1, correct? A, On May 12 I had a discussion with Theresa Trzaskoma in which she described her sort of wondering whether the juror who had sent that note referring to respondeat superior and vicarious liability was the lawyer whom she'd earlier located by a Google search. I don't think that I received significant information, but I did have a conversation with Ms, Trzaskoma about the note, which was at that point new to us, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010000