DOJ-OGR-00010003.jpg

Cabas i Ze Or tc eeD AS SU eminent 662 (Aiba ORS OOP Reka S36 f dfS0B0 womoitnunesWwhe NNN MN NRE BR Pe ee RPP Pe WPrFW NP Ob OAR BW Ne Oo A-5720 263 C2GFDAUL Brune - direct Ms. Trzaskoma certainly accessed it on the computer, and I now know that that opinion or decision includes the middle initial. QO. And it was the identical name, Catherine M. Conrad, that appeared on the potential juror list that the clerk's office provided, correct? A. I now know that to be so, QO. Well, and that opinion was not just any suspension opinion, it was a New York court opinion, correct? A. That's right. ®. And you could have asked your team prior to the start of voir dire to do additional research on this issue, correct? A. I certainly could have. Q. And you chose not to? A. I don't think I put it that way. The plan was to hear from her on voir dire and find out based on her answers to Judge Pauley whether she was the same person. Q. Well, you didn't do it, correct, Ms. Brune? A. If the question is -- oO. It's a simple question. A. I know, and I'm trying really hard to answer it. Q. It's really a yes or no. Did you or did you not ask any of your team prior to voir dire to do additional research? A. Oh, I did not. That's absolutely so. Q. You had everybody, you had a team of literally almost two dozen people available to you, correct? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, F.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010003