DOJ-OGR-00010076.jpg

Cabas i202 Or 4OcRGsD AS NL eminent G6 27? CFnibet ORS DOP Re HORS F aifS080 oan oT & Ww he NNNNMN PP eee PPP Pe UPERWNFPOMWMInU SW NrE OW A-5793 336 C2GFDAU3 Edelstein memo that had been put together and the link to the Westlaw report after we received the letter from Catherine Conrad. ®. And did you discuss it with Susan Brune? A. Discuss what? Q. The Westlaw report and your examination of it as well as your examination of the suspension report. A. I believe I -- well, the suspension report, if you mean the Appellate Division order? Os Yes. A. I believe I discussed the Appellate Division order. I did net discuss the Westlaw report with her. Q. What was the nature of your discussion with her? A. Well, I believe that after we received the June 20th letter, I first had a conversation with Susan just upon receipt of the letter and reading it and the substance of it, you know, I was very disturbed by the letter. This has nothing to do with Catherine Conrad being the suspended lawyer because at that point I didn't know. When I first received the letter I was sort of, I was disturbed and shocked by it. We had spent three months in the courtroom where everyone wants to know what the jury is thinking about various subjects. We then receive a letter that gives us some inSight into the jury deliberations and I was very taken aback by some of the things that she said. I felt that we had sat here trying to read the tea leaves with various juror notes on the one hand and it was just very SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010076