DOJ-OGR-00010112.jpg

Cadac ®2QOAR URE PAN 1 Bema rreni Gee 0 Fis DUP ab deep ba ai11717 wow nu eS w he A-5829 372 C2grdau4 Berke - cross learned about the juror or believed or the connection between the juror? A. No. I think I have told you the substance of what I recall of that conversation. Q. She didn't explain in any fashion why she thought it was important to tell you at that period of time? A. No. Q. Did she tell you anything else that her firm had learned that gave rise to the belief by one of their attorneys that there was a connection between Juror No. 1 and the suspended New York attorney? A. No. Q. Did she tell you any of the underlying facts? A. No. The only other thing that I recall is that when talking about the note, we both noted that we believed that Juror 1 had said she had been a plaintiff in a personal injury case, which might explain the respondeat superior. I can't say for certain it was in that identical conversation, I believe it was probably was, but I do remember talking about that as well. Q. Let me ask you this. If you had learned from somebody at the Brune firm that they had a written report showing somebody named Catherine Conrad had a personal injury or had a private lawsuit, would that be a piece of information that you would want to have had at the time in order to do your own analysis? A. dust to be clear, what I'm referring to, I believe the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010112