DOJ-OGR-00001035.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) Ww a OY 20 21 22 23 Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page94 of 200 k7e2MaxC kjc THE fore moving There is a basic dispute within the papers as to, I think, ef COURT: on Forts similar to Ai FFOrES O indication of de risk of from aut I'm sorry, Ms. from those points. Moe, if thorities, notoriety and public in following the O reasons. determination be resolved, if what is your general response assertion? MS. As we discussed in our reply brief, view, the court's determination with respect to bail reasons. The these indictmen terest that Fort to protect privacy and hide Flight or whether, t of Mr. Epstein, to the ones you have described that which would certainly be 31 [ may pause you are an in light of the the case has generated whether it was an MOE: Yes, your Honor. to the veraci from press for privacy How does the government suggest that that you agree that it should, factual and ty first is, of your Honor, that in our irrespective of ability to live in hiding, facts make clear to the court that the det there is no question these circumstances ar for that she is good at it, the det relevant to a number of fFendant's motive, Fendant has the that she is willing to do it even if it compromises her relationship and contacts with other people and, as the information provided by the real estat she is good at it and that agent underscores, SOUTHERN D STRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00001035