DOJ-OGR-00011115.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document690 Filed 11/19/21 Page /7 of 23 jurisdiction, e.g. New Mexico] at the relevant time period, the sexual conduct she says occurred with Mr. Epstein was not “illegal sexual activity” as the Government has charged in the Indictment. However, to the extent you conclude that her testimony is relevant to the issues before you, you may consider it. However, you may not consider this testimony as any kind of reflection on Mr. Epstein’s nor Ms. Maxwell’s character or propensity to commit any of the crimes charged in the Indictment. The parties may submit any requested edits to the proposed limiting instructions that are consistent with the Court’s ruling or indicate that they have none on or before November 21, 2021. This resolves Dkt. Nos. 387, 444. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2021 AN \) is New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge DOJ-OGR-O0011115