DOJ-OGR-00011458.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 734 Filed 07/15/22 Page8of16 November 19, 2021 Page Eight may be made available to Maxwell, if appropriate, at the conclusion of each witness’s direct testimony.”°? Maxwell also appears to have sought subpoenas directed to “four individuals seek[ing] similar materials,” including EVCP materials, a request this Court denied in August 2021, again without prejudice to renewal.*° On November 15, 2021, we learned that Maxwell sought leave to serve a subpoena on Ms. Feldman for certain EVCP documents and that the Court intended to authorize the subpoena. That same day, we informed the Court that we were authorized to accept service of the subpoena and that Ms. Feldman intended to move to quash it. We received a copy of the subpoena on November 16, 2021. The subpoena requests four categories of materials from four individual victims: (i) “EVCP Material” (as defined in the subpoena) for the four victims; (11) communications between the EVCP and the four victims “and/or their Attorneys”; (ii1) copies of payments to the victims “and/or their Attorneys”; and (iv) any releases that the four victims executed. The government filed its motion to quash the subpoena yesterday, which provides ample basis to quash the subpoena. Ms. Feldman sets forth the following additional reasons to quash the subpoena. 3° Order at 7-8 (ECF No. 252). © Opinion and Order, dated Aug. 13, 2021, at 2, 5, 10 (ECF No. 334). DOJ-OGR-00011458