DOJ-OGR-00011533.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be NO Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE M6SQmaxl that for now. Paragraph 72, because her by a 2009 deposition Again, to this at trial. Paragraph 74, Document 737 det testimony. credit Carolyn' the d Filed 07/22/22 Page 14 of 101 14 Fendant objects to the assertion that Epstein briefly penetrated Carolyn's vagina with his penis trial testimony the defense claims is contradicted overrule this objection. testified s testimony. assertion as to the age and timing. Again, Carolyn plainly fendant again objects to the we'll pick up on that issue when we discuss the appropriate guideline manual. inclusion of Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 the perjury counts have Paragraphs 75 and 76 the de these paragraphs in the present fendant objects to the not been presented she contends have no bearing on the sentence do overrule this objection. largely unlimited as to consider. It's free to dropped counts of acquittal in determining sentence. 839 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. an indictment, 2016). to a jury, nce report because and so in this case. A sentencing court's discretion is the kind of information it may consider evidence of criminal uncharged crimes, activity resulting in long as the information I may consider is reliable and accurate. following reasons, I do 23 24 25 severed perjury charges United States v. Bennett, the information as For the conclude the informa is reliable. The de under oath in 2016 that to recruit underage girls she was not aware of tion underlying the fendant testified Epstein's scheme SOUTHERN (212) 805-0300 STRICT REPORTERS, P. for sexual massages and other than DOJ-OGR-00011533