DOJ-OGR-00011628.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a fan) = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE because of attorney-client privilege and wit LBNAMAXTps the obvious issue tha Document 739 would arise with Filed 08/10/22 Page 7of43 7 th Minor Victim 4's right to representation of counsel. MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, first, your Honor, I don't think that it's appropriate for me to have to discuss defense strategy in this context. However -- THE COURT: That's fine. There will be no —- without briefing, you will not call an attorney for a witness, period. I'm happy to see briefing, but until that happens, you won't. MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine, your Honor. THE COURT: OK. MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor. We had one other question for your Honor, which is whether the Court inform the jury pseudonyms. to approach that issue in our opening st intends to, in its preliminary instruction, that We wanted to know certain witnesses will be testifying under THE the two sides having slightly di language to use COURT: that so [ think w hav fferent views as that yet, you're asking is, instructions as opposed to at the time the called. you'll ret I will. but wil for those instruc And then tions. tatement. a pending proposal, to what I haven't dealt that we understand how with with I guess the second question 1 IT include that in my preliminary It should come befor opening, first witness is SOUTHERN D STR CT RE (212) 805-0300 I presume, PORTERS, P. becaus fer to witnesses pursuant to pseudonyms during DOJ-OGR-00011628