DOJ-OGR-00011632.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 11 0f 43 11 LBNAMAXTps 1 this trial in paper format is that there's just too much paper 2 involved. And the plan would be, if we're going to be 8 impeaching the witness, you know, on an inconsistent statement 4 or something else, that we would simply display that 5 electronically to the Court, counsel, and here at the podium, 6 and the witness, do the imoeachment, and then take it down. 7 These would not be things that would be shown to the jurors. 8 But want to make sure that that's an acceptable process to ] the Court. 10 THE COURT: There are times when the witness will want 11 to see the full document, so you'll have those available should 12 they ask for them or need them. But it's certainly consistent 13 with standard practice to show the document electronically, 14 and, again, say, you want to s more, ither the whole 15 document in paper or the page before or after, you'll 16 accommodate that. But otherwise, I don't see an issue. 17 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. As the Court may have 18 recalled, when the parties submitted a joint proposal with 19 respect to issues regarding witness anonymity, one of the joint 20 proposals was that exhibits under seal which contain 2] identifying information or victims or other relative witnesses 22 would be handled in paper copies with binders for the jurors? 23 THE COURT: Because the screens are visible. 24 MS. MOE: Exactly, your Honor. And so to the extent 25 any of those exhibits fall within that category, our view is SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011632