DOJ-OGR-00011648.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a fan) = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LBNAMAXTps TH Saturday, 1 that your expert has di provide not MS. TH any sense, and the to, vidence th | f there's E COURT: COURT: So an Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page27of43 27 , Ms. Menninger, with respect to ything in the notice that's suggested fFferent expert opinions on, please ice. Otherw MENN NGER: An based on the disclosures, defense say imagine you government would hav ise we'll see how it plays out. Of course. Thank you, your Honor. I don't have d then LaPorte and Naso, what evidence this will go s that's because they don't know what will produce. What documents do you thes MR. testify, issue relates your PAGLIUCA: Honor. T to Accuse doubt that endorsed really see it playing out. Up, Lt as Can. that's going them just out of it becomes an issue, don't But testifying at trial. xperts analyze? I think it's unlikely that they will he only document that was potentially at r No. 2. And I doubt that that -- to become an issue during trial. We don't and I an abundance of caution, think if it comes it -- if But certainly I'll give as much notice really think they're going to be THE COURT: Good enough for me. Mr. Rohrbach. MR. ROHRBACH: I'd like to say it's good enough, your Honor. The concern is that if the defense decides mid trial that they would like to call these experts, it's going to create a difficult situation for the government to file the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011648