DOJ-OGR-00000117.tif

54a e Maxwell moves to dismiss the perjury counts because, in her view, her testimony responded to ambiguous questioning and was not material. The Court concludes that these issues are best left for the jury. e Maxwell moves to sever the perjury counts from the Mann Act counts so that they can proceed in a separate trial. The Court concludes that severance is appropriate and will try the perjury counts separately. e Maxwell moves to strike language from the indictment that she believes is superfluous and to dismiss conspiracy counts she believes are redundant. The Court concludes that these motions are premature before trial. e Maxwell moves to compel the Government to immediately disclose certain categories of evidence. The Court concludes that she is not entitled to do so, but the Court will order Maxwell and the Government to confer on a discovery schedule. e Maxwell moves to dismiss all counts because a grand jury in White Plains, rather than Manhattan, returned the S1_ superseding indictment. Because a jury in Manhattan returned the S2 superseding indictment, the motion appears moot. I. Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement does not bar this prosecution In September 2007, under investigation by both federal and state authorities, Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution agreement (“NPA”) with the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern DOJ-OGR-00000117