DOJ-OGR-00011999.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330 LBUVMAX6 lie. MS. M the sentence h TH | -PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 227 of 247 359 Jane —- direct ENNINGER: n cooperating situations, your Honor, COURT: appens after the testimony. Well, but I think they are not the same, the point is the same. testifies, legal instruct I'll give a limiting instruction that after sh that the jury should understand she's not providing ion, but testifying as to her understanding in response the question again, understanding. I don MS. M to the question. OE: No, And so with that -- and you'll say make sure it's phrased from her T'll overrule. With that, "tL see any reason this should be sealed. your Honor. MS. M ENN NGER: No, your Honor. MS. M wanted to flag question financial about her financial their opening. O I would ask would be just simply, stake in understanding, —-— which mal Just to avoid a second sidebar, just , after asking this question, I expect the next Do you have a this case? that's the outcome of Again, whether she believes she has a is exactly what the defense suggested in THE COURT: Oh, there's no doubt. MS. MOE: just want to flag that. THE COURT: You have an objection to that question? MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. But think she does SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212%) 805-0220 DOJ-OGR-00011999