DOJ-OGR-00012006.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE UCmax7 LB troduced, e) that for view of thwith. tent there are ot Fer that have not MS. fF Rule 16. If it's Document 743 in violation of Rule 1 Os Filed 08/10/22 Page 234 of 247 [ think MENN NG BR: covered by th would like. Ms. prior inconsistent sta admissible as impeachment by my reading of Comey. MS. rul We will Your Honor, Ww ther exhibits that the d int 393 to the nds to hav t already been produced to us, ns we brief this tonight if I have a very di COMEY : Your Honor, THE pla G MS. COURT: COMEY: Exactly, Fferent view, your Honor. evidence. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, witness's memory, bias, motive, all of thos materials. Impeachment is not limited statements. That's just not the state of THE COURT: You can brief it. So if testifies live in a blue house and you go out take a photograph of MS. TH oD 5 Go apparent would ask the Court order that they make those productions di fferent a very it is an impeachment document, it is not your Honor tly, than we do not believe that any Lements that would be admissible -- It's not a prior inconsistent statement. Nothing else is the rules of anything that goes to the one to prior inconsistent the law. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. COURT: SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 2) impeachment the witness t tonight and the house and it's a red house -- —- and you want to introduce a photograph DOJ-OGR-00012006