DOJ-OGR-00012012.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 _ Filed 08/10/2 L BUCmax7 know, as the Court may recall, Jane testifi 2 Page 240 of 247 388 ed earlier today about having disclosed having been abused to a person who we are identifyi ng in this proceeding as Matt. Matt would be testifying ab the next witness in this case We anticipate that who would be out a prior consistent stateme offering that testimony under both prongs o and I'd be happy to walk that through with With respect to the first prong of THE COURT: Is there an objection? MS. STERNHEIM: 'd like to hear t THE COURT: You have clarity on wh MS. STERNHEIM: Well -- THE COURT: I don't, so I don't kn MS. STERNHEIM: think I would ha next witness is going to say with the testi nt by Jane. We are f Rule 801(d) (1), the Court. the rule -- heir bases. at the statement is? ow if you do or not. ve to parse what the mony here because it doesn't dovetail as the government is suggesting. THE MS. COURT: Okay. Can you be spec MOE: Of course, your Honor. ific? I'd be happy to provide a pro he was inaer years thereat er. I'd anticipate that Mat elationship with Jane in 2007, ter. And during those years, conversations with Jane in which Jane told was growing up as a kid, her family struggl] t would testify that "O08, and '09, and he recalls having him that when she ed financially and he asked her how they were able to pay for growing up, a nd she told him that there was things when she was this uncle or SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew DOJ-OGR-00012012