DOJ-OGR-00012233.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 LC1Omax6 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Jane - Redirect make objec tion to that, I do object there was no test supplant what th tO oO ther aspec timony, e primary wit but GS and THE Th the term, th is witness can't ne told him that but COURT: wer y th underag th (e) r wer or not, can't all I mean, I do object to £ his 3500 material tness did not testi Page 213 the term girls, of 264 624 and insofar as this witness should not be used to Fy about. agree with you on tha testify as a prior consis I think since the witness couldn't LOW at as an implication since that imp] consistent with the testimony. MS. be clear, think it is, age of 18 are ret MOE: Yes, your the witness t distinction. tent statement that there's ambiguity in testi Fy i licat Honor. that the jury must in underage girls in fer the room be unfor tunately, ferred to as girls. it. if our intention to elicit particular about the ages of remembers it TH ma why don't you just say other ld the Court would pre fer, an and that's the COURT : Why don't you —- people, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P. (212) 805-0300 From the evidence that to make tion wouldn't I think on this point, t be to there cause of d use th Mat t's tes & rm £ males. those folks, timony. the government doesn't intend to argue in closing were common that often women above the That's how he remembers I would be happy to lead him through that testimony, It's not t the testimony to suggest anything in but that's how he word he uses. T'll let you lead, but or something like that. DOJ-OGR-00012233