DOJ-OGR-00012258.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 264 649 LC1VMAX7 Matt - direct frustration about that. That is entirely consistent with her NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 testimony that she was, in fact, abused. MS. STERNHEIM: But not with regard to her mother having a confrontation. THE COURT: Well, it's a prior consistent statement that he heard related to the abuse which you've repeatedly called into question in your opening and your direct and in your cross-examination. MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I understand that. But we're talking about prior consistent statements. THE COURT: Right. The prior consistent statement is that she was abused by Jeffrey Epstein. MS. STERNHEIM: But they are bringing out a conversation. If she wants to say, Did you know or learn that she was abused? Yes. But a conversation that she had with her mother is hearsay. MS. MOE: Your Honor, it's not hearsay because it's a prior consistent statement of Jane about her experiencing sexual abuse. THE COURT: Yes. Overruled. (Continued on next page) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012258