DOJ-OGR-00012479.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Document 747
Filed 08/10/22 Page 194 of 228 870
LC2VMAX6 Alessi Direct
be heard on this issue. I apologize.
MS. MOE: 'm sorry, your Honor.
Just to frame the issue, I recognize we've been
clarifying the record about time periods. Our view on
authentica
tion for this exhibi
t is this
witness is not
authentica
I recogniz
ting it as a documen
Ww
t from a particular time period.
ve been asking questions about that.
The question before the Court is whether this witness
can authen
Maxwell and
ticate this exhibit as a document belonging to
his observations of the book.
question in terms of our persp
THE COURT: That's £1
it was a later book. Ms. Come
We thought
jury to disregard that testimony.
to voir dire, you'll seek admi
it, I may not admit it,
we were on foundati
Epstein or a document that he recognizes based on
So we just wanted to frame the
ective.
ne. I didn't ask the question if
y did. There was an objection.
on. That
ssion,
"s where we are.
I'm now ruling, sustaining that objection, telling the
Then it's the defense's turn
11 rule. I may admit
testimony of employee one.
MS. MOE: Yes, your H
I may reserve until we hear the
onor. Thank you.
(Continued on next page)
SOUTHERN DISTR
CT REPORT
BRS, Pes
(212)
805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00012479