DOJ-OGR-00012517.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 _ Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 236 907 LBUCmax1 1 of pulling down her underwear exposing her buttocks. That was 2 excluded by your Honor on motions in limine. There is a 3 Similar photo, it's the same photo. The one we excluded was 4 that photograph which was hanging on the wall, it was on the 5 floor, but Government Exhibit 270 was the same photograph on 6 the wall. There is consent to that one. Yes, we agreed that 7 that would not be offered. So 270 is not going to be offered. 8 There was one that we didn't reach agreement on, which 9 is Government Exhibit 250. In the motions in limine, your 10 Honor, you excluded Government Exhibit 251, which, if you 11 recall, was a photograph of a toddler, an infant walking 12 forward towards the camera with an adult in the back, naked, 13 and excluded it on 401 and 403 grounds. 14 There is another photo, which is Government Exhibit 15 250, which shows -- maybe we can pull that up if we can see it. 16 Is it on your screen, your Honor? 17 THE COURT: Yes. 18 MR. EVERDELL: That, as you can see, depicts Jeffrey 19 Epstein with a slightly older girl. At this point, I believe 20 it is the same girl with her lying across his lap with her 21 bottom -- although with underwear on, but he's got his head 22 down close to the bottom. 23 think, for similar reasons, this is not relevant and 24 is prejudicial. It shows him with a prepubescent girl. There 25 is no allegations that he or Ms. Maxwell, for that matter, were SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012517