DOJ-OGR-00012573.jpg

fe NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO a fe No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC3KMAX2 (At the sidebar) TH | COURT: Document 749 Alessi - Cross Filed 08/10/22 Page 59 of 236 963 Let's just set the stage. The testimony yesterday said "multiple occasions with her mother, some occasions without the mother; her up and drive her." MR. PAGLIUCA: TH FA COURT: MR. PAGLIUCA: On line Okay. in those instances, he would pick Generally, 9, we have: yes. with her mother on three occasions, THE COURT: MR. PAGLIUCA: "Three" You agree that is the testimony? "T personally observed Jane along not multiple occasions." Not in my view, inconsistent with "multiple." At Mr. THE COU RT: MR. PAGLIUCA: H asl El COURT: MR. PAGLIUCA: HW qo Ez language. ,; COURT: MR. PAGLIUCA: number. It's not multiple, WAt Mr. So is Yes, [ mean, Epstein's —- It is more unless w [T don't understand "multiple." 'r is not "multiple"? your Honor. It is than one. I understand. We may be, Epstein's home in speaking a different but this is quantifying the it's three. Palm Beach. TI don't recall the year," which is also inconsistent with his testimony yesterday. SOUTHERN D STR CT RE PORT ERS, (212) 805- 0300 PG ew DOJ-OGR-00012573