DOJ-OGR-00012754.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO Ww a OY 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC6Cmaxl to recall detail considered th Document 751 _~—«Filed 08/10/22 ls. letters by both sides which were seal pursuant t language in the accurate. It is fair to both I accept the government's suggestion o Federal Rule of Evidence 412. limiting instruction. Defense opposed this request. I Page 3 of 261 filed ensures a balanced limiting instruction, sides. It is also appropriate in light of defense's opening. One question, that I direct, would be more a not to so ask. so, it would op the sexual conduct she says occurred with counsel, quote, the parties to not Epstein. 1143 have under to include the The statement is and it the the draft language suggests ask Kate details about think it eccurate to say that I'v that if the def directed the government were to do [ have indicated en the door for the government. ns So I'll hear from you as to whether your request is to indicate the parties or the government. Mr. Rohrbach. MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor. The government just tried to offer a more neutral instruction, but I agree that your -- that that edit is more consistent with the Court's ruling. THE COURT: Mr. Everdell. MR. EVERDELL: I don't think we have an objection if it's the government was directed or however -- THE COURT: Thank you. The instruction, in total, would read -- my next question after this is the parties' SOUTHERN D CT RE 805-0300 STR (212) PORTERS, Piss DOJ-OGR-00012754