DOJ-OGR-00012769.jpg

fe N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO Ww a OY 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC6Cmaxl [ hav in practice, Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 261 1158 r been in the courtroom when my years nev ies Lu. client test for this very reason. MR. ROHRBACH: The g question, is your attorney in additional, what is the name out your attorney to the jury thinks has no relevance. THE COURT: I agree. attorney here, I've certainly attorney in the room. So bey the attorney -- MS. STERNHEIM: Th overnment wouldn't object to the the courtroom today. It's the of your attorney, can you point , those questions the government Are you represented, is your seen witnesses testify with their ond that, what's the relevance of relevance is that this is an attorney who sat through the prof the attorney who was instrume this is an attorney who has w is pending in his own book. handling that is going on and I know that. this is fer sessions with her, ntal in starting the Epstein Fund, ritten about her while this case There is a tremendous amount of think the jury is entitled to THE COURT: How is t MS. STERNHEIM: 'm the book is public, she's in hat information going to -- going to ask her questions about, the book. think that she has agreed to have her story put in a book, not in her own name, and I'm not going to make reference to her name, but I think all of these things are fair game. There are many other topics that will be raising prior to my cross examination. This is SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORTERS, P.C. (212 ) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012769