DOJ-OGR-00012773.jpg

fe NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO a fe No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 22 of 261 LC6Cmaxl exhibits should be under seal. THE COURT: [ thought I did admit that under seal, but maybe I misremembered. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, we ended up admitting the one complete documen the one that contains redactions so that it case number, [ think otherwise public has access the can for example, there is a way to the bulk of personally identifying in I think to seal. 't be matched up, certainly the plaintif It is now marked J8 and 9 because it's narrowly tailor it may include the Es! but names, to redact the exhibi formation. Again, believes are th I'm happy to speak with Ms. identifying piece of in Formation, the defendants' publicly on So, not comport with Lugash and us to sort of ide PA COURT: didn't already, confer on redactions MS. MOE: the record, Yes, I think to keep th take a pen to So let's do this, names and other pieces wer this so that the but portions of but just not the SOF Moe about what she things that would lead to be a personally it, including testified about not under seal. your Honor. ntir xhibit under seal does th Same J8 and J9 are temporarily sealed and you'll I do want to flag, full, 13 becaus t is very easy thes other precedent that requires the parts that are concerning. PEOCESS. ds We'd be happy to confer. documents are entirely public for a member of the public to compare SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew 1162 DOJ-OGR-00012773