DOJ-OGR-00013008.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC6Cmax7 And by the way, WwW wer Document 751 Meder di Filed 08/10/22 Page 257 of 261 1418 recluded f p rect rom cross examination about her publicly available photographs of a similar type. TH ina relevance of this photo is that it Epstein, which COURT: [ don't unders is different than th (e) Ffering. Ih MS. M the circumstan it very releva the photograph was, et cetera ave G INNINGER: CES. nt. ld Your Honor under which that tand the parallel. The was in possession of relevance that you were to compare apples and apples. , had she testified about was made, it may have made We're just not going to have testimony about having been made when it was made, how old she and then once she's of the stand, introduce a photo of her that could have been authenticated through her, but was not. a moment, Judge? [ may, on the issue of this MS. STERNHEIM: May I have THE COURT: You may. MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, if picture and the issue of nudity, brought up in the South of France, [ was essentially precluded from raising issues concerning nudity, and a witness who was who was quoted as saying she is comfortable with being nude was an area ripe for cross examination if to use this pho Now, back, that's a whole dif can just put in i f they wil tograph when the wit the government had n 1 permit t erent issu ot strategically decided not ness was on the stand. he witness to be brought e, but this idea that they vidence after a witness is off the stand and SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013008