DOJ-OGR-00013214.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC7Cmax6 counsel. So it's really a cumul to make, has already been made, prejudice in including the document itself. And on a 401, I presume you']l MS. are crafted by lawyers COMEY : Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Carolyn - cross 403, Your Honor, particular causes of action. THE COURT: Right. MS. COMEY: t will cons written ina witness, and I putting these words in that her attorneys wrote. write this. lative argument. it is already in, ll make on redirect. in order to satisit narrative form and it Page 201 of 264 The point that you want 1642 it's a document. Since the point my concern would be fuse the issues and i t wasn't of fered by that I don't see that there is tremendous these fy the elements of this think it would confuse the issues to start THE We'lv COURT: already think it causes substantial 403 prejudice, make those redirect points in any event. respect to this document C4, objection. GO p 206 says, employees, Kellen, expressly, assistants ret the purposes of fF allowing def I think might be ina di Kel and others reached an agr [ think thos fin len is one of ar redirect poin stablished the 401 of the omi So I'm going to overrul defend ssion, at Fferent position. mu ant Eps Ferenced in paragraph 12. I don' le the tein's ment betw n themselves fendant Epstein to commit the t's not She did not ts. and you're going to least with I mean, Epstein, for SOUTHERN D STR (212) CT REPORTERS, P.C. 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013214