DOJ-OGR-00013219.jpg

fe NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO a fe No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC 7VMAX7 Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Carolyn - cross Page 206 of 264 1647 this is inconsistent because w not -—- we're not talking about 2001, we're talking about 2002. THE COURT: Right. But it doesn't specify -- she testified to incidents like these in 2002, and so it's just not -- tell me how it's inconsistent with that testimony. MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, you know, for the second time in July of 2002 —- THE COURT: No, it doesn't say that. MR. PAGLIUCA: Paragraph 39 is what I'm looking at. THE COURT: Oh, you told me 33. am a lot of things, but am not a mind reader. sustained on 33. I will go to 39. Go ahead. MR. PAGLIUCA: So for the second time in July of 2002. This is -- THE COURT: [ mean, that reads like more than one incident in July of 2002. MR. PAGLIUCA: The second, not a third, not a fourth. THE COURT: For the second time. Okay. MR. PAGLIUCA: And when we get through all of this, the other inconsistency that tracks allegation of sexual one oO] every single one. intrusion or penetration. all of Every single these is there is no fF these allegations is fondling of breasts and buttocks, And so we have new testimony about the acts that were allegedly performed. THE COURT: All right. Ms. Comey, do you want to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013219