DOJ-OGR-00013226.jpg

fe NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO a fe No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 213 of 264 1654 Fferent argument LC 7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross THE COURT: Sustained. MR. PAGLIUCA: 177. THE COURT: Sustained. MR. PAGLIUCA: 183. THE COURT: Sustained. MR. PAGLIUCA: There's a slightly di on 189. THE COURT: Okay. MR. PAGLIUCA: And 195. These are th brackets it bef Fore 2004, testimony. And so thes complaint which does not go MS. themselves ar COMEY : complaint. nd dates of the allegations, which which 1s inconsistent with the Your Honor, THE contact? COURT: MR. incident one and incident two. PAGLIUCA: THE COURT: MR. the complaint PAGLIUCA: are the last two dates alleged in this still consistent. there were any allegations contained af Well, And there are no Right. farther think Mr. than August of 2003. I think the paragraphs Pagliuca can make the point by asking the question of the witness about whether Fter August 2003 in the Is there a line that says it's the final it just says August 2003, further allegations in SOUTH ERN D STR CT REPORT ERS, (212) 805-0300 2) DOJ-OGR-00013226