DOJ-OGR-00013230.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 217 of 264 1658 LC 7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross that they saw her naked. There was no other color on it. There was no suggestion that they wer ngaged in sex acts or that they were naked. I have the same objection. THE COURT: I'm going to overrule on that one, 20. There's the inference available of inconsistency, so I'll allow 20. Next. MR. PAGLIUCA: 21 is a description —- THE COURT: Just to spell that out, on the theory that other males present in the room during conduct described could be deemed lewd and lascivious conduct. MS. COMEY: just want to be clear, your Honor, that the description was that they saw her naked in the massage room, not that they saw her during any of the conduct. I think there was testimony that she would be naked for a period before Jeffrey Epstein would come in; and so it would just be them seeing her nude in the room is what the testimony was, not lewd and lascivious conduct. THE COURT: Well, I'm going to overrule on 20. Go ahead. MR. PAGLIUCA: 21 is simply asking a description of the lewd and lascivious exhibition, the date, and whether you received money or other consideration. Answer, none. THE COURT: Okay. Exhibition we did not get testimony on, so I'll sustain. There's no inconsistency on 21. No SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013230