DOJ-OGR-00001329.jpg

Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page12 of 25 parties to support Maxwell’s bond did not alter this conclusion because “the amount of wealth that she would retain were she to flee, in addition to contingent assets and future income streams that are not accounted for in the bail package, would plausibly enable her to compensate them, in part or in full, for their losses.” (/d. at 18). Judge Nathan also rejected Maxwell’s proposed conditions of release to a relative’s custody and private security guards, reiterating her concern regarding Maxwell’s “extraordinary capacity to evade detection.” (/d. at 18-19). 22. Finally, Judge Nathan was “unpersuaded” by Maxwell’s argument “that the conditions of her confinement are uniquely onerous, interfere with her ability to participate in her defense, and thus justify release.” (Ud. at 20). Maxwell did not “meaningfully dispute” that she has received more time than other inmates at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) to review discovery and as much, if not more, time to communicate with her lawyers. (/d.). Judge Nathan reiterated that she would continue to ensure that Maxwell is able to speak and meet regularly with her attorneys and review discovery to prepare her defense. (/d. at 20 n.3). D. = The Third Bail Application 23. On February 23, 2021, Maxwell filed a third bail application, proposing two additional bail conditions: (1) renunciation of her French and British {2 DOJ-OGR-00001329