DOJ-OGR-00013299.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC8Cmaxl articulated a the testimony received th record, on it func Document 755 theory like tha for Government Exhibit 76 Filed 08/10/22 Page 21 of 262 1726 t with regard to this record, but 1 was that the school integrated it into its business record financial MS. tion and practice of under that for its admissions decisions, the MENN NG BR: Your guarantor piece of line of and relied files, which are a regular school. Honor, is of it, fering For tha tha and verified by the school t piece, the t's the piece that EPUEA GF we obje take out the piece that they're of the matter ct to. If I would renew my objection to the admission of they didn't which is what So it would come in as a CaSSs » rely on the the government asserted therein, and they want to redact that fering that was not THE COURT: I'm telling you my rationale at the time for ruling on the objection was that the relevance was that the family at the time was indicating that -- whether it's true or not, but that Mr. Epstein was providing financial assistance. MS. MENNINGER: f it was admitted for a limited purpose then, your Honor, I would ask that there be some typ of instruction given -- we can take up at the charging conference about the purposes for which that document can be considered by the j MS. ury. ST RRNHE M: the Court is aware, whereas Judge, just want to make sure that I don't object to the admission as SOUTH ERN D STR CT REPORT ERS, Ps (212 ) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013299