DOJ-OGR-00013558.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page17 of 49 1990 LCOVMAXT that -- and, as said, I wanted to have agreement from both sides on it. But the reason not to do that would be if we might get to closings before the following Monday. And that's why it's really -- because if we wi get to closings before the following Monday, the charge needs to be done before then. MS. STERNHEIM: Of course. And we will update the government and the Court with regard to scheduling. THE COURT: Okay. So I think if there's a chance that the defens ither won't put on a case or would rest before Friday, then we should do the charge conference Thursday night. So that's the question. MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. Does the government have any preference or views on that? MR. ROHRBACH: The government has no preference. That makes sense to us. Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. Great. Yes. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, in connection with the defense case, I do think there's still the outstanding issue of the subpoena to Mr. Glassman. THE COURT: Yes. I was looking at that last night as well. And I have a question and a little bit of a proposal, see if we can get back to a magical moment. It's a SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 di Fficult DOJ-OGR-00013558