DOJ-OGR-00013594.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCACmaxl Document 759 copies on the subset of those, as well. MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. MR. PAGLIUCA: I guess my question, what's going -- TH | COURT: Hang on a second. MR. PAGLIUCA: -—-— Filed 08/10/22 exhibits by letter, Page 3 of 267 2030 and you'll move your Honor, is when we address this My belief, with the witness, to the jury is really the question. was the government was not offering the was offering the photocopies of think, a significant distinction here. THE COURT: obviously, you've objected. To any eve even after that, thing it's been discussed or discussed at the time it was moved? MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. government simply moved to admit the —- pages. That was the extent of the because we were dealing with would have that exhibit, admitted per the government's request, the record exhibit as part of entirety of the various pages, the exhibit that was being admitted to the jury, So you're opposing movement of nt, you have an objection to moving to the jury or you just think it's inconsistent with suppose inconsistent with how it We had this colloquy. [ think 52, the government and that was and that's, the -- but I've overruled, the whole how was The it's five the admission. foundation issues, but My suggestion, was that we we would agree to the copies being I wanted the actual for any necessary appellate SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORT ERS (212) 805-0300 p PiGe DOJ-OGR-00013594