EFTA00397887.pdf

From: Lesley Groff To: Ike Groff <I Subject: Re: Why I'm not angry at Lance Armstrong By Sally Jenkins Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:39:52 +0000 yes, I read that also. On Jan 16, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Ike Groff wrote: Read page two also From: Lesley Groff [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:30 PM To: Ike Groff Subject: Re: Why I'm not angry at Lance Armstrong By Sally Jenkins thanks. interesting On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Ike Groff wrote: Why I'm not angry at Lance Armstrong By Sally Jenldrts,llecember 15, 2012 <imagesjpg≥ gmage002.pnwIllew Photo Gallery : USADA says Armstrong will be banned from cycling: The U.S. Anti-Doping... I like Lance Armstrong, have always liked him. Not the fairy-tale prince, but the real him, the guy with the scars in his head, both visible and invisible, the combative hombre who once crossed a finish line swinging his fists at another rider, the contradictory, salty-mouthed, anti-religious nonbeliever, who nevertheless restored a chapel. The man who tried to whip cancer fair and square, and did more good with his name and fortune than any athlete I've ever met. I've searched high and low for my anger at Lance, and I can't find it. It's just not there. I checked — looked in every corner, and I'm empty of it. I've tried for weeks now to summon the moral certitude and outrage that others seem to demand, and I don't have it, maybe because he's my friend and co-author of "It's Not About the Bike," but also because my opinion of him was never based on what he did in a bike race in France to years ago. And while we're on that subject, there is no question in my mind he was EFTA00397887 the hardest-working cyclist in the world, and for the life of me, I can't find the competitive injustice in his seven Tour de France victories. Maybe I'm not angry at Lance because, though I hoped he was clean, it's simply not shocking or enraging to learn that he was like all the other cyclists who sought a medical advantage in riding up the faces of mountains. Or because I've long believed that what athletes put in their bodies should be a matter of personal conscience, not police actions — when we demand unhealthy, even death-defying extremes of them for our entertainment, it seems the height of hypocrisy to then dictate what's good for them. Or because after reading the U.S. Anti-Doping Age rep t, and more importantly the rider affidavits, what emerges is a portrait of a sport in which needles were so deeply embedded that the choice was simply to use them, or quit riding. And I don't have it in my heart to condemn any of the athletes in it, much less Lance, son of a Kroger supermarket checkout girl,who had a singular talent and whose career option was to go home, and do what exactly? Maybe I'm not angry at Lance because more informative than the USADA report was an ESPN interview with his former teammate Jonathan Vaughters, who observed: "There is the huge misconception, though, that this is about Lance. This is about a culture that Lance was a part of, and that he participated in ... If you want people to be truthful and want to know what actually happened, as opposed to chasing ghosts for the next io years, then you have to let them know that we won't chop your head off." Maybe I'm not angry at Lance because I've decided that the smoldering wreckage of the bonfire that burned down Big Tex was wildly out of proportion to the offense. And because, much as I would have liked a personal or public confession from him, I suspect that he understood what the price of it would be, and found the stakes too high to call up his friend at The Washington Post and bring it all down on his head. Maybe I'm not angry at Lance because, after reading the rider affidavits, I think it's apparent that all of the people associated with him are responsible for themselves and their choices, just as I was. If Floyd Landis, Tyler Hamilton, Christian VandeVelde and Dave Zabriskie took EFTA00397888 EPO during the Tour de France, it wasn't because Lance Armstrong shot them in their butts with it. I enjoyed and profited from my association with Lance when he was on top, and so did his fellow riders. Lance never made me write a single paragraph in "It's Not About the Bike" or the sequel "Every Second Counts," and the vast majority of them, I stand by as honest. Such as this one: "Cycling is so hard, the suffering is so intense, that it's absolutely cleansing." Maybe I'm not angry at him because after reading the USADA report and the affidavits of the riders who spoke with USADA, I have some common- sense questions that preclude anger. Such as: Shouldn't an organization with the initials U.S. in front of it have to follow due process? And: According to the affidavits, the U.S. Postal Team had a highly organized "doping" system in place long before Lance became a member of it, so why is he the target of this report? Or: The affidavits taken by USADA make it clear that while Lance refused to use HGH, Floyd Landis introduced it to younger riders, so why is the federal government considering giving Landis whistle-blower protection? Ike Groff <image003.png> I® This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachments( is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify the sender at or by replying to this e-mail and delete the e-mail and any attachments( from your system. Nothing herein shall be construed as a financial promotion to any person or persons, or a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other investment or to engage in any trading strategy. Information presented is from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate or complete. This information should not be taken as an offer nor as a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities o other financial instruments. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure, timely or error free. Tourmaline Partners, LLC may review and store both incoming and outgoing messages. Use by other than the intended recipients is prohibited. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment( s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notity the sender at or by replying to this e-mail and delete the e-mail and any attachment) from your system. Nothing herein shall be construed as a financial promotion to any person or persons, or a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other investment or to engage in any trading strategy. Information presented is from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate or complete. This information should not be taken as an offer nor as a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities or other financial instruments. Email transmission cannot be EFTA00397889 guaranteed to be secure, timely or error free. Tourmaline Partners, LLC may review and store both incoming and outgoing messages. Use by other than the intended recipients is prohibited. EFTA00397890