DOJ-OGR-00013835.jpg

fe N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO a fe N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCAVMAX8 with her, on field trips. combination with The defendant D Document 759 talked about sex with her, to concludes that the defendant was coercive control with Jane, Jan Filed 08/10/22 "s testimony, bought her gifts, in r. Rocchio's testimony, in a relationship of Page 244 of 267 would lead the 2272 took her jury exercise control where, Jane's sexual abuse o CES enticement statu conduct course of years. t the defendant But even 1 timony is, f£ Jane. te is met as to that statute was met, aiding and abetting theory. argument that Je rey to get Jane to continue to travel de the So those fendant are plenty of Jane herself, which would have allowed her reasons why to l to New York personally engaged in the engaged in with Jane over in light of the many f the Court didn't readily conclude that the defendant is also charged under an and coerce Jane LO it's quite obvious given that she was when the abuse was years to knowingly it. So that, is met. And remarkably low. SOUTH LJ: vel to New York. tha on hap ass again, i finally, I'm sure your Honor is already aware, the plane and in pening. And she Epstein didn't entice, t the defendant was aware of the room in persuade, And given that ociate herself wi th it and to S a separate here, New York facili And there can be no serious induce, fact, that plan, took steps over multiple La be I would just remind your Honor, theory by which the statute as the standard here is All that is required is that taking all ERN D STR CT REPORT BRS, Pes (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013835