DOJ-OGR-00013836.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCAVMAX8 inferences in the conclude --— they could That bar is surmounted very easily by just Jane alone, and I testimony THE that would support COURT: final points, Document 759 __—~ Filed 08/10/22 government's favor, Page 245 of 267 the jury could the testimony of 2273 find a conviction on Counts One and Two. have not even discussed other corroborating All right. Thank you. Mr. Everdell? EVERD BLL: Just two, COURT: Microphone, please. EVERD ELL: can do it COURT: That's fine. MR. EVERD BLL: The point about Mr. won't leave alone; conspiracy count. count. ; COURT: but, of course, that conclusion. your Honor. from here. Epstein's actions only applies to the Obviously Count Two is the substantive MR. EVERD ELL: Wel 1, yes, don't see any test imony of abetting Jeffrey Epstein, enticing her to You'll address aiding and abe aiding and abet travel Ghislaine Maxwell aiding a There's remarkably little testimony about is what the subject of have to show that York with the intent knowing that statute, would be violated. SOUTHERN D Ms. Maxwell enticed Jane the substantive count that ac when she got that New York statute that's cited in STR (212) CT REPORTERS, 805-0300 2) is, to travel there, ting. tion righ tting? So nd to New York. , and that t. You to New that the indictment, DOJ-OGR-00013836