DOJ-OGR-00013863.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCGVMAX1 that any of Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 nonprivileged information it's possible to get After careful such that information the defens attorneys, I conclude, Ss is either not in is duplicative of these witnesses will testi is not consideration, ks to elicit formation elicit and, therefore, marginally relevant to the limited in testimony. wit th one exception, Page 4 of 246 2299 fy to relevant outweighed by prejudice, the outweighed by prejudice, as to be outweighed by 403 prejudice. The one question I intend suggested the parties stipulate to [ will permit Mr. the government case against and testi Glassman to b ked ference of to permit is the one testimony th as tell the government that you told Jane Epstein's estate and Ms. ollowing: from the three t relevant under Rule 401, ted on cross-examination or is only potentially impeachment so from Mr. Glassman. Did you to the victims' The que directly because it seeks only to know what Mr. the government. compensation fund? that cooperating with Fying in this case would help her civil Maxwell and/or her claim stion does not elicit privileged information Unlike the other prof fers, Glassman told this testimony is relevant because Mr. Glassman yes, that the impression against Ms. Maxwell and her claim to the '"s testimony, if could contradict Jane's testimony and allow an testifying would help her civil fund. SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 the answer is inference to the jury that at least at one point she may have been under Case With this DOJ-OGR-00013863