DOJ-OGR-00013870.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 LCGVMAX1 The first is the actual land registry are here, which show -- would like, which show the £ the O'Neills as of '92; as of '97. That's here. and I Page 11 of 246 2306 records, which can pass them up irst ownership, wh if the Court ich belongs to and then title passing to Ms. Maxwell There's also a land registry record which shows the actual trans fer of title which this as well. describes all of And then there are the records that are found in Mr. Grumbridge's files, because he was the attorney who represented Ms. Maxwell in this transaction, which include that agreement for sale, because that's a private document, but it exists in his files, it's still there. And Mr. Rooney has seen it in his files in London. And he's prepared to testify to that because he's here today. And a few other were in his files that relate to this sale of Lu. the transfer of t MR. ROHRBACH: THE COURT: Okay. tle at that time. Mr. Rohrbach. I think that the point documents that the property and Mr. Everdell just made about how this is confusing and comp reinforces two of the government's arguments. First of all, putti transfers and lLeaseholds ownership of the propert understand British real about when she, in fact, ng this confusing tha y wo esta Occ licated set of land t speaks to when the defendant took uld confuse the ju te law and actuall upied the property ry into having to y says nothing for the reasons SOUTHERN DIST RICT REPORTERS, P. (21 2) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013870