DOJ-OGR-00013872.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCGVMAX1 impeachment as to when sh to when sh Document 761 lived ther owned it? MR. EV BR DELL: O'Neills owned th O'Neills, not Ms. Your Honor, Maxwell. THE UR IT: They don't ren MR. relevant. We're equally shows that she owned it, EV ERI DELL: I'm sure, could argue to That's somet the jury. able to arg and what Kate is Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 246 2308 What is the relevance the records show that the at property until 1997, ue to some family of the t places in London? thing that the government, But this is extremely the jury that this testifying to it shows ownership. I get couldn't have happened becaus THE COURT: Well, again, that. The relevant question is residence. 1992. What there prior evidence do you have as to whe testimony from Ms. to ownership? MR. BV BR DELL: THE (Counsel CQ UR conferred with dejf Maxwell that sh lived The government has Your Honor, if TT: You may. MR. And if the government wants to admit the to argue the opposite mini trial. BV BR DELL: And then this problem -- and to be able to admit Your Honor, point, then okay. Fendant) this would not be a mini there beginning in ther or not she Lived [ may have a moment. I think the solution to trial -- is for us the records showing the ownership records. testimony to be able But that's hardly a each side gets to argue their point. SOUTHERN D STRICT R G iPORT ERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew DOJ-OGR-00013872