DOJ-OGR-00013876.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCGVMAX1 we would also like to include, Mr. prior to this, Grumbridge would have about because he was in that it's -- testimony, like to relevant counsel de fense showing to work testimony. transaction as well, Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 17 of 246 2312 which is in Formation that t the Stanhope Mews ownership the lawyer and solicitor involved from my understanding. to make the same poin [ think it because tL. But ij 's relevant testimony, get in all to this issue of MR. ROHRBACH: We're and try counsel has not produced any records to the government this prior ownership of THE COURT: MR. ROHRBACH: We'11 parts of his testimony that to work something out. ownership. happy Stanhope Mews. All right. SO think f we're going to lose his I would I think are to confer with defense I would just note that confer with the defense and try out a stipulation. LEE, COURT: Great. Okay. All right. So I got rnment seeks the gov anticipated testimony on the use of investigators, technique of patient' Ss experience. Moving on the letter dated to exclude two aspects of xpert testimony on suggestive ac and her anticipat response pressure Thank you. to the Dr. Lo ftus December 15th in which Dr. Lo ftus's tivities: In an order dated November 21st, 2021, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Her leading questions by government ted testimony on the therapist to provide more detail about a ruled that DOJ-OGR-00013876