DOJ-OGR-00013884.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 25 of 246 2320 LCGVMAX1 1 isn't impeaching her -- wouldn't be impeaching her testimony in 2 any way. We just don't understand the relevance of these 3 exhibits. 4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, it's evidence that she 5 maintained a relationship with the people in her abuser's -- 6 alleged abuser's office. I mean, if she claims that she left 7 New York and she fled this life with Epstein and didn't want 8 anything more to do with it, this is evidence that she was 9 keeping contact with people in his orbit. Ms. Espinosa worked 10 in his office and was there with him in the office every day. 11 So it goes to show that there was a continuing 12 relationship. She voluntarily sent these photographs to her 13 showing that she maintained that relationship voluntarily, 14 which I think is the opposite of what you would do if what you 15 wanted to do was put all this behind you and not be a part of 16 this world anymore. 17 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, my recollection of Jane's 18 testimony was that she herself acknowledged that she had 19 maintained a relationship with some of the individuals and 20 their orbit on direct examination and in the course of her 21 testimony. So, again, I don't understand the relevance of 22 these photographs. 23 THE COURT: So just to be clear, you're saying that 24 vidence came in already that she maintained a relationship; 25 correct? SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORT ERS, (212 ) 805-0300 PG ew DOJ-OGR-00013884