DOJ-OGR-00014000.jpg

fe NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO a fe No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCGCmax4 over the prior inconsistent statemen in this amount of them. from out our joint proposal, Carolyn prior inconsis testifying tomorrow. THE 25 COURT: MS. MENN NGER: break. Document 761 AF Okay, Lo ftus TERNOON SESS 2:05 p.m. where are we Your Honor, We appreciate how lengthy two of time, o try to reach agreement on all of The witnesses th of state and would be testiit think, Filed 08/10/22 —- direct ON ? the government and I Page 141 of 246 spoke t contentions ar fying this af W the witness's were unable, at pertain to those two would be The one that pertains to Carolyn is here testify or be released this af court this afternoon, try there are only three sta MS. COMEY: Th tent sta for us ome to reach agreement on the two related "s correct, ternoon and then, your Frernoon. at the close of So would be to address right now the Lement so that witness could to Jane Honor. to sit down with the testimony and and Annie. I believe tements at this point in dispute regarding Carolyn, so I think we can resolve that pretty quickly. Mr. Pagliuca, I believe, has the list of the three that I believe are in dispute. MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, your Honor. The two that are agreed to are at transcript 3610, 9 through 15 -- I'm sorry. Not 36. I have 35 numbers in my head. 1610, lines 9 through 15; 1611, lines 1 through 5. Those correspond to the following statements in the 302. SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORT BRS, Pes (212) 805-0300 2436 DOJ-OGR-00014000