DOJ-OGR-00014154.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCHVMAX2 there were thousands of photographs only obviously a subset that was pr MS. MENNINGER: Right. Ms. photographs, your Honor, not to the MS. COMEY: Your Honor, Document 763 _— Filed 08/10/22 Page 48 of 197 2589 seized, and that there was esented to the jury. Meder only was speaking to number of devices. [ would note that that was a Situation where we called a witness to talk about photographic evidence the defense properly cross-examined evidence. What the defense is now su to do is bring in a whole host of o There was Mr. Flatley, who testifie I believe what single hard drive. about is all of the other devices t this the course of investigation. the Court's orde be in violation of affirmatively in our case that was seized; and then that witness about that ggesting they should be able ther investigative steps. d about extraction from a Mr. Everdell is talking hat were seized throughout And I think that that would r. It would also be extremely confusing, because when we're talking about this investigation, it's a little ambiguous what we're talking about, as we alluded to earlier. This investigation was broader than just what resulted in these charges. MS. MENNINGER: Well, your Honor, there was a search that the government elicited information about that occurred in 2019 of our alleged co-conspirator's home. The question can be phrased because they THE COURT: Which witness was that? SOUTHERN D STR CT RE PORTERS, Piss (212) 805- 0300 DOJ-OGR-00014154