DOJ-OGR-00014204.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330- LCHCmax3 what timeframed. in which the witness testift massages with - MS. MO individuals who are at issue in this case. jury whether Maxwell and other people, PAE So you want th GI knowledge about this case. The not at issue in the question misconduct absence of Document 763 Dubin - direct Filed 08/10/22 tim fram Yes, THE COURT: which the witness testifies. MR. Just so the record is clear, litigated at al PAGLI UCA: your Honor, misconduct wit can do that, this case is not relevant. think you should narrow th your [ don' pretrial. about Ms. Maxwe pretrial. ll or not being there, This really is foundational to the n Page 98 of 197 2639 allowed in overruling your motion to preclude is narrowed to the window fied that there was sexualized and limited to particular It's not before the Epstein committed misconduct with is whether she has relevant with the people who are at issue in th other people who are Honor. tim in fram t believe this was This witness was not questioned which were litigated ext quest tion, which is going to be aft then into the relevant t activity, activity. Out relevant, e) that activity, r she stopped dating him, t's act any of So tha £ this into your Honor, that. imeframe, ually the nex But it seems frankly because if CO me did she see any of ct quest which is this F which she considered to be inappropriate SO tion. to be logically she had seen any of SOUTHERN DISTR CT RE PORTERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew I'm moving I doubt she would have been dating him or would DOJ-OGR-00014204