DOJ-OGR-00014277.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCHVMAX6 Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 171 of 197 2712 admission that he vacated East 69th in or about January '96, and then Judge Chin's decision making that finding of fact. There is one other document from that docket that we seek to admit, but under a separate rule of evidence, 804(b) (1). There was actually a deposition transcript from Mr. Epstein in which he is asked -- and it was taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. And he was asked in tha moved Street t deposition, Is in or around three times. And Mr. Epst from the premises meaning the beginning of [ believe it exactly when. admissibl "96? is around then, East 69th -- to 9 but it correct that you Fast 7Vl1lst tein responded, You asked me that question I don't know This deposition excerpt was appended to a pleading THE COURT: MR. substantive point, Street issues we' I will go ROHRBACH: b Vv under 804(b) (1), Okay. Yes, that was submitted by the U.S. their case at docket number 52. through each of Attorney's Of So your Honor. n talking about. And substantively -- THE COURT: MR. ROHRBACH: This is very much li Microphone. One at a time, the documents, Mr. SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORT (212) 805-0300 BRS, Pes Fice in support of the deposition transcript. I believe that one is Rohrbach. but just as a this is very much like the 44 Kinnerton ke the 44 Kinnerton DOJ-OGR-00014277