DOJ-OGR-00014279.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCHVMAX6 MS. MENNINGER: Oh, yes, your Honor. I apologize. have copies for the Court, THE COURT: Okay. Document 763 ‘Filed 08/10/22 Page 173 of 197 2714 and I gave a copy to the government. MR. ROHRBACH: Judge Chin sets out the summary judgment standard on page 12. THE COURT: Yes. so 201 Do you want to respond to the summary judgment point? (bob), the Court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute. MS. MENNINGER: This was the government's motion for summary judgment; and it was Mr. Epstein's admission that that's when he vacated th in terms of tha answers and the to introduce one or the ot premises. So I don't think that —-- t's why I think that you need to take both the summary judgment together, rather than trying ther. It was the government's position that he abandoned in January of '96, and he admitted that. MR. ROHRBACH: The defense is not offering any of Honor. MR. RO HRBACH: these documents which contain the government's position, your MS. MENNINGER: That's not true. Docket entry 52 is a submission by the government. apologize. I'm talking about the summary judgment opinion and the answers, but not the government's claims, which is not a document -- I'll speak -- SOUTHERN D STRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014279