DOJ-OGR-00014280.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCHVMAX6 the summary judgment opinion and letter, [ think, is a sort Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 174 of 197 2715 the answers. all we have is a summary judgment opinion. the basis was in which Mr. for it. what the question was. which applies which is that And I suppose And w to the let and so there was no reason for the government Mr. Epstein, in fact, residences. What mattered in that litiga in early 1996, Mr. Epstein made an at sublet of ejectment matter to the government whether Mr. the property; and back rent tter and and so the government was suing hav Epstein asserts some this was not a material som answers to cross-clai of separate matter than the Thos ones wher ak We don't know what facts to which we don't know this brings me to the broader point Epstein deposition as well, Fact in that Litigation; from Mr. Epstein. But to litigate when lived in and was occupying the particular tion is that at some point tempt to do an illegal for it did not property in January 1996, was no reason li b tigation. fore h for that It just ma the background section of not a signit is actually absolute December 1995, to be litigated in the course of November 1995. Epstein abandoned the There that ttered that he abandoned the property ly no reason to tried to do the illegal Judge Chin's opinion; Ficant portion of a for the same reason, ny of take judicial sublet. the other documents. notice of That's why it's in that's why it's There it. And it's not subject to the 804 SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORT ERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew DOJ-OGR-00014280