DOJ-OGR-00014284.jpg

fe NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO a fe No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCHVMAX from on advance their claims about says, was, 6 residenc You asked me Is it correct to anot Document 763 MS. MENN NG the a BR: n tha t question Jist in or around the beginning of times. when. in 1994 tha CES the argument [ believe That's THE COURT: tha the exact tL you moved Filed 08/10/22 t ejectment and back rent. nswer itsel f, Mr. Page 178 of 197 ther one by a certain date in o Epste 2719 rder to in three times from 1996? questio What was the MS. MENN NG BR: it is around th t's relevant. And the position of So I think Nn -- response? en, but Jane was that he was under 401, It is certainly di TIT don't . And the g the premises to 9 You asked me that question thre know ex Living it is a question of whet fferent timony —- DHE COURT: that it there was a mot The fact tha --— contrary BR: ruling, that MS. MENNING Honor. That can offer judgment ruling. THE COURT: For What else? the same reason, than the t it was asked three times uestion Fast © actly there her is to my immediately prior this tive to develop it? There was motive to develop it, was the whole point of the complaint as well, Okay. litigation. but it's in the summary it's sustained. SOUTH ERN D STR CT REPORT ERS, (212) 80 5-0300 PG ew DOJ I mean, your -OGR-00014284