DOJ-OGR-00014368.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCTIAMAX2ps record that rela Document 765 THE witnesses on individuals' element with from each of Ms. Maxwell, COURT: So the defe their perceptions o ages, SO Filed 08/10/22 Page 64 of 95 2802 tes to that topic. So I think that -- nse has questioned multiple f individual ages, of relevant that puts respect to ages, an the a but of accept that f testimony (e) whether ther Cc ourse I don into question the knowledge d it's true there's testimony lleged victims as to what they told "ft know whether the jury will testimony or not, or any of those individual pieces . So it seems like having -- the question here is are specific elements, knowledge elements that are in issue, ither because it' goes to or b make argument caus th defense h ts regarding that. the case that t the def ense won't closing anything with respect to s what some of the evidence as made cross-points or will I mean, I don't suppose it's —- will it not argue during whether Ms. Maxwell knew of the relevant ages? MS. STERNHEIM: May we have a moment, Judge? THE COURT: Sure. MR. PAGLIUCA: Here's the -- I'm going to try to address there's a larger concern. I need to break this into two pieces. THE COURT: OK. MR. PAGLIUCA: One that I view as an evidentiary issue with the indictment and the evidence in the case is that there was testimony about multiple females being at the Palm Beach SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR- 00014368