DOJ-OGR-00014473.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 73 of 257 2906 LCKVMAX4 Summation — Ms. Moe Finally, I also expect the defense will make arguments to you about property records in London. Those all came in by stipulation on Friday. They'll say that Maxwell didn't live at 44 lived -- deposition, here it is, that she had lived at Street since 1992 or 1993. So either the def Kinnerton Street in 1994, when Kate met her; and that she Maxwell herself testified under oath the whole time or she mixed up her two London did too. Either way, it just doesn't matter. that Maxwell lived in another house nearby in London. But that's just another distraction and here's why: in a 2019 44 Kinnerton ndant lived there houses and Kate So next, the defense has argued to you that Jane and Kate and Carolyn and Annie are all lying. The defense has asked you to believe that Jane and Kate and Annie and Carolyn, that they are all lying for money. But none of that makes any sense when you look at it closely. It doesn't make any sense when you look at the evidence. Now, all four women have testified that they submitted claims to the Jeffrey Epstein Victim Compensation Program. They were awarded millions of dollars. And that happened well be are done and the witnesses don't get anything at no Fore this trial. Their civil lawsuits are over. Those cases out of testifying this trial. They were clear in their testimony. They have financial stake in the outcome of this trial. None. And one of the other ways you know the witnesses SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014473